€ 26,00 (Euro) to this paypal address: [wcologarb
writing "ob-6 patches" + your email in the title / note.
I will send the
soundset after I get notified about your payment
(max 24 hours).
Via Debit / Credit Card:
Send me an e-mail letting me
know you'd like to have your card charged - I will send you a payment request
and it will be processed by my Paypal and your bank (you don't have to own a Paypal account,
your card is enough, it's 100% safe -
here's full explanation).
How many patches?:
You will receive all the sounds from my Youtube & Soundcloud demos plus extra sounds (136 original patches + their variations = 150 presets in total).
Need to hear more?:
Different styles / sounds in my audio demo:
What format / import method?:
My soundbank will come to you in two formats: sysex format and OB-6 Sound Tower
Any external processing?:
I did not use any external FX in the demo, no layers, etc. All the
delays and reverbs are part of the OB-6 engine.
Notes on grades lower than 3/3:
is a "vintage" type of architecture / sound more than anything else
interesting features, but only one lfo, unflexible setup
but not as dense as the champions (like Rev-2)
fx, but still not enough tools to bend the sound out of recognition
bad, but the above limitations keep it down
Just like the products of its countrymen from
Moog, this Sequential synth is a top quality instrument with even less
shortcomings - if any! It's great that Dave Smith decided to use a "no force necessary" type of buttons,
and guys at Moog have yet to figure out this is the only way to go. There is not
one thing in the OB-6 that seems likely to break or at least malfunction (provided,
of course, that you protect it from dust). Perfect resistance of knobs, nice
keyboard, not too heavy, not too light.
USER INTERFACE - NO MENUS COME AT A
It's pretty obvious for everyone that has eyes, but
it needs to be mentioned: the interface should win an award. It's a classic
design and an instant-gratification synth. I know, I know - there are numbers
instead of patch names, no possibility to edit the sequence without relying on
software, etc. But let's be honest. If you can afford this kind of synth, you
probably are so successful that you have no time to play it, let alone dive deep
into the sequences or come up with fancy patch names. So why care about these
quirks? You don't experience them anyway. Joke.
On a more serious note: it's natural to praise a synth which has every
feature laid out on the front panel and bemoan the ones which have some
menu-diving. But we have to remember that many times the "easy" synths
everything on the panel because their engine are limited - and that's why there is enough
room on the panel for all the controls. On the other hand, the synth that requires some
menu-diving does so because it has much more features. If manufacturers tried to
fit all those
knobs for all those features, the synth would end up being as big as a cow barn.
It's true that such synths exist, or rather existed (Yamaha CS-80, ARP 2500, etc),
and each time a picture of one pops up it's causing synth nerds to drool, but
those times are over. So
yeah, the OB-6 could win an award for its "what-you-see-is-what-you-get" user
at the same time it should get a spanking for the obvious and irritating limitations of the
THE SOUND / WHAT IS "PLASTICITY"?
When I got the OB-6, I asked my friend
why this synth sits on the bestseller list while it costs so much.
I mean, there are the Deepminds, and the Odyssey clones, and the Microfreaks, and the
OB-6 among them looks like a macaw in a field of cabbage. "It's the sound",
he said, "people pay for the
Oberheim sound". I thought "okay, let's check out this Oberheim
sound". I started playing the synth and... I asked myself "where is this
wonderful sound that everybody's talking about?" Maybe it was the factory
patches, because at
the OB-6 sounded thin &
glossy & metallic.
I went to Youtube but all the videos only confirmed my first impressions: it
costs $3000 and sounds like crap! Holy cow! Call the police! But very soon
I managed to "get" this sound (or
and some patches managed to enter the league of "the unbeatable" (LP/BP filter
morphs, x-moded basses, synthetic
brass-like tones, etc). Also, the envelopes are
so snappy and punchy that I would swear the sounds are running thru a compressor if I
hadn't made them myself.
Let's get back for a short moment to the fact that the modulation possibilities of the synth
are in some
aspects severely limited. Even though it's true, this is only a piece of the
picture. Let me throw in the
Prophet REV-2 for comparison. The REV-2 has much
more modulation options, but the core sound is "stiffer". The effects of such modulations
may fall short of your imagined or
anticipated results. OB-6, on the other hand, has a more "cooperative" sound
from the get-go, so
it's easier to modulate it into something convincing or appealing. Still, the
scope of timbres (or "plasticity") of the OB-6 is below average. It's quite a
common thing; synths that have a very original sound suffer from limited plasticity of
this sound. It's a real joy to be able to hear this specific, dirty, wonky,
sometimes-creamy, sometimes-metallic sound of the OB-6, but it's quite hard to escape it.
always feel silly & uneasy discussing the theme of timbre plasticity for two
reasons. First is that it's the most tricky and difficult quality to understand
& judge, but at the same time it's very important to me. Second is that there
never seems to be enough plasticity in any given synth. We will always find a
nuance or a quality of the "innate timbre" that is "hard to escape". Even with
the most "plastic" synths out there, like the Hydrasynth, people still struggle
to kill or move around a certain quality of the sound.)
So when you finish having your usual fun with your
OB-6 (like tweaking the hell out of the variable filter), don't forget to
tamper with the Detune knob, the Pan Sprad knob to give the sound that extra
space / spaciousness, and most importantly the X-Mod VCO2 knob, which will
introduce some unpredictability / instability. Just remember that the OB-6 is a
little bit unstable in itself, so if you add bonus detuning to that, the X-Mod
section will create a challenge. Because if the VCO2 pitch changes each time you
hit a note, the modulations generated by this VCO will vary, so sometimes it's
impossible to have consistency (for example when you mod a pitch destination and
pitch stability is needed).
Also, don't underestimate the FX section. On paper
it looks pretty standard: delay, reverb, chorus, flanger, phaser. But bear in
mind that you
can combine 3 of them at the same time (any 2 of the above + hidden distortion).
So if there is any trick that you can employ to widen the sonic palette of the OB-6,
the FX is the place to go. The effects sound good and they can go to solid extremes and mangle the timbre
noticeably. This transforms the FX unit into another sound sculpting module,
which can't be said about the FX design of other synths, say, Korg Minilogue XD,
whose FX section is rather a decorative element.
I can't for the love of Christ understand this "advice"
I'm seeing for almost every synth out there which says "DO NOT USE THE INTERNAL
FX BECAUSE IT KILLS THE BEAUTIFUL ANALOG SOUND". Geez. Am I deaf? I wish all effects on synths were that bad. If
the OB-6 effects are bad, then the
REV-2 effects must be called nothing else but
One more thing: pay attention to the ring
modulator too: in its non-usual mode, it tracks the pitch of the lowest note
that you play on the keyboard. Combine it with the seqeuncer and you can go
I don't know why that is, but the only DSI / Sequential
synth that seemed "100% right" to me was the
Evolver. I played the Prophet X,
the REV-2 and I
asked about the Prophet 12. Those synths are unable to launch the LFO and fill its
phase independently of key strikes (note on/off). Here, the OB-6 cannot properly
latch the Arpeggiator (I don't think there even is a button for that). So in the
aforementioned synths it's impossible to keep consistent LFO modulation across
the sequence; it sounds different with each key strike (or restarts in an ugly
way with each key strike). And since I am a human and not a robot with quantized
movements, in OB-6 the lack of Arp Latch option makes the Arpeggiator pretty useless for me, and it's
better if I program an arpeggio pattern into the sequencer, but of course
that has its drawbacks (I'm a slave to the rhythm, to quote a classic).
Generally speaking, the OB-6 reminds me heavily of
the Nord Leads. One: it sounds as if it was already
mastered in a studio. Two: the sound is kind of "thin" but lucid, so that's the
good kind of thin (it never gets muddy / brassy / woody like in the case
or Matrixbrute). Three: the interface is hands-on, you
get what you see, no menu diving, etc. Four: the build quality is top of the tops
(actually much better / more sturdy than Nord Leads). Five: made in the
country of design (USA for OB-6, Sweden for NL). Of course in the end the OB-6
more than the Nord Lead thanks to its FX, filter morphing and modulation
routings. But the first three characteristics alone ("pro" sound,
sound clarity, UI)
are a recipe for success among the synth crowd that rarely fails.
I'm not a nerd with an oscilloscope and I
don't spend 4 hours each day splitting hairs on a forum, so I'm not sure, but
probably the OB-6 uses some analog components that have their significant cost (and
which make it sound much better than the aforementioned Nord Leads).
Still, I think
the OB-6 sounds too
sterile / hi-fi compared to "real" analogs. Don't get me wrong
- it is one of the best synths if you want to achieve the "vintage" sound by
using modern hardware. Also, many of the patches are
winners & keepers. But if we compare it to "real" (old) analogs, to my ears there's too much "sheet metal" feeling
to the OB-6, and quite often it's painful not being able to add this or that
modulation. So I'm in
two minds about it. I would have to think hard whether I want to shell out the
€3000 on the hi-fi OB-6 and have my peace of mind, or buy a dirty-sounding
vintage analog and worry that it dies too soon.
Support this page when you